kodachromeproject.com Forums  

Go Back   kodachromeproject.com Forums > The Kodachrome Project..

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-27-2009, 08:42 PM
Dan_KR64's Avatar
Dan_KR64 Dan_KR64 is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 487
Dan_KR64 has disabled reputation
Default New set on Flicker...

I just started a new set of Kodachrome on Flicker:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/2358573...7614528413728/

My fav might be this one:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/2358573...7614528413728/

Enjoy!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-27-2009, 09:39 PM
ZoneV ZoneV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 469
ZoneV is on a distinguished road
Default

Looks good, and it's great to see the ones of the president. I didn't realize he signed that bill outside. Or is it inside? The light is extremely even.

Guess what I'm doing right now.

Developing film.

Are the ones you uploaded so far all Kodachrome 64, or are some 200? They all pretty much look like 64 to my eyes, but then again, that one you said is your favorite could almost have been Kodachrome 200, except the fine grain gives it away as 64. It must have been quite overcast.

The Obama closeup one looks more like it could be 200. In fact, I'm going to go out on a limb and stake a guess that it is 200.

Last edited by ZoneV; 02-27-2009 at 09:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-27-2009, 10:35 PM
Dan_KR64's Avatar
Dan_KR64 Dan_KR64 is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 487
Dan_KR64 has disabled reputation
Default

You can see what I used in the tags on the right of each photo.

In the case of the medium to tight Obama stuff, I used the F100 with KL-200 in it.

I have very few rolls of it left and I really do save it for shots like these.

Sour face kids was 64.

So, I get home from the Obama event and put my gear away. I notice the VR switch is set to "off" on the 200-400.

I go a whole week thinking I am totally screwed since I shot at 1/80th at 400mm handheld. As it turns out, I must have hit the switch off by accident when I put the lens away, they all came out fine.

And yes, the light was perfect, very even, spilling naturally from above and light fill from some gel'd HMI's for T.V.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZoneV View Post
Looks good, and it's great to see the ones of the president. I didn't realize he signed that bill outside. Or is it inside? The light is extremely even.

Guess what I'm doing right now.

Developing film.

Are the ones you uploaded so far all Kodachrome 64, or are some 200? They all pretty much look like 64 to my eyes, but then again, that one you said is your favorite could almost have been Kodachrome 200, except the fine grain gives it away as 64. It must have been quite overcast.

The Obama closeup one looks more like it could be 200. In fact, I'm going to go out on a limb and stake a guess that it is 200.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-27-2009, 11:11 PM
ZoneV ZoneV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 469
ZoneV is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan_KR64 View Post
You can see what I used in the tags on the right of each photo.

In the case of the medium to tight Obama stuff, I used the F100 with KL-200 in it.

I have very few rolls of it left and I really do save it for shots like these.

Sour face kids was 64.

So, I get home from the Obama event and put my gear away. I notice the VR switch is set to "off" on the 200-400.

I go a whole week thinking I am totally screwed since I shot at 1/80th at 400mm handheld. As it turns out, I must have hit the switch off by accident when I put the lens away, they all came out fine.

And yes, the light was perfect, very even, spilling naturally from above and light fill from some gel'd HMI's for T.V.

Silly me, I didn't realize there were tags!

KL-200 is awesome. I do have a few good rolls of it that I keep for special situations, myself.

Whoa, thankfully the VR switch was actually on! I know that feeling, because I've done things like that.

Yeah, I knew there were some fill lights for TV; that shadow under his chin told all, and the slightly warm luminescence juxtaposed with the blue backdrop makes for an excellent skin tone/separation. It reminds me of that illusion with the checkerboard where the two gray squares that look totally different due to the shadow illusion are actually the same intensity. Kodachrome 200 seems to be able to handle it well; despite the color temp difference between the overcast light and the gelled fill lights, it mixed well...sort of like a main rythm and a backbeat that compliment one another in a musical piece.

Last edited by ZoneV; 02-27-2009 at 11:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-01-2009, 06:14 PM
Ektagraphic's Avatar
Ektagraphic Ektagraphic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southeastern Massachusetts
Posts: 534
Ektagraphic is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Ektagraphic
Default

Awesome! Obama finally preserved on Kodachrome!! I was at a flea market today and I found a slide tray full of Kodachromes from someones trip to London. There are some photos of all of the iconic places in London. It was so fun to watch on a screen. The colors were perfect and look like they were taken yesterday!! I also picked up a couple of vacation slides on Ektachrome taken almost at the same time (1976) and the colors were terrible! All faded and most turned red. Only Kodachrome withstood the test of time. I was not surprised!!!
__________________
July 22, 2009. It is the ending of an era. Goodbye KODACHROME.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.